Posting this after roughly a year on specific forums for men seeking older women for serious relationships? — the pattern got clearer than expected.
My sticking point is that the photo verification step seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking, which is the real problem with relationship-focused platforms.
As far as I can tell, local activity levels explains more of response rate than which tier you're on ever did, but people in bigger cities tell me the opposite.
One honest account of for serious relationships? beats ten listicles.
Something worth knowing: whether an account has been verified outweighs whether it has a swipe interface for older women and their matches, and the sample size here is basically one where evaluating the alternatives is concerned.
Been running EZHookups in parallel — it doesn't gate messaging, which is rarer than it should be.
The pattern I keep seeing is that on relationship-focused platforms, how recently a profile was active beats which platform you picked for older women and their matches.
What actually frustrates me is that the distance filter surfaces profiles that haven't been touched in months, which is the real problem with relationship-focused platforms.
Datedesire came up in a similar thread and the activity level was better than I expected.
More often than not, for mature daters, whether an account has been verified tends to decide how many replies you get in a week, but that was months ago and things move.
The thing I didn't expect was that the reporting tool resets every time the app updates — and nobody mentions it when they talk about evaluating the alternatives.
Luvdate is worth twenty minutes — quick to set up and free to evaluate properly.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with specific forums for men seeking older women for serious relationships?? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.
