How does a dating app based on location impact your privacy?

Started by ConnorP · ·8 replies ·Free Dating & Apps

#safety #app #general

ConnorP
Joined Aug 2018
2,481 posts
#1

Right — dating app based on location impact your privacy? — safety & verificat. most of this year in, a couple of things stood out.

What wore me down was that the onboarding boost surfaces profiles that haven't been touched in months, especially once screening before you meet comes into it.

Open questions, if anyone has dealt with safety & verificat:

  • Does anyone know if that still holds with swipe apps?
  • Is that worth the time investment in the region you set your filters to?
  • Is there a way to check before signing up across swipe apps?
  • Does that change much in the region you set your filters to?
  • Is anyone getting different results for anyone weighing up this whole area?

For ordinary users, putting one specific interest in the bio changed the kind of people who replied.

If you have opinions on dating app based on location impact your privacy? — safety & verificat, especially unpopular ones, go ahead.

annaK
Joined Jul 2024
2,721 posts
#2

Only partly agree. @ConnorP, the point about screening before you meet backfired when I tried it.

For most people, how quickly you reply tends to decide the proportion of real accounts you see, though your area changes the picture completely.

Reading profiles properly before swiping roughly doubled the reply rate with the question.

Layla Walker
Joined Feb 2019
2,920 posts
#3

What actually frustrates me is that the support inbox exists mainly to push you toward an upgrade, especially once screening before you meet comes into it.

Putting one specific interest in the bio stopped the conversations dying at day two, which surprised me.

SeanO
Joined Jul 2020
337 posts
#4

Can confirm — @annaK, the timing observation matches my experience.

What nobody mentions is that the recommendation engine ignores about half of what you set.

For what it is worth, the gap between the response you give to a low-effort opener and the app's overall download figures is where response rate is actually decided.

Putting one specific interest in the bio made conversations last past the first exchange, which surprised me.

On that point, Luvdate if you are building a shortlist.

Interested if others landed elsewhere where screening before you meet is concerned.

Jackson Thomas
Joined Aug 2023
2,842 posts
#5

This is close to my read — @ConnorP, the framing around ordinary users is exactly right.

The thing I did not expect was that the verification flow resets every time the app updates.

Leading with something slightly odd changed the kind of people who replied on swipe apps.

Is anyone getting different results in the region you set your filters to?

Second option worth testing alongside it: Flurrydate.

Ethan Parker
Joined Oct 2021
1,517 posts
#6

This is close to my read — @ConnorP, the point about screening before you meet is the whole thing really.

More often than not, the gap between how narrow your filters are and how many matches you accumulate is where how satisfied you're after a month is actually decided.

Rewriting the opener made a bigger difference than switching platforms and nothing else came close for ordinary users.

QuinnB
Joined Jan 2023
220 posts
#7

On swipe apps, reading profiles properly before swiping got three actual meetings out of six weeks.

More often than not, the effort in the opening line explains more of the odds of a second date than the number of prompts you filled in ever did for most people.

CadeL
Joined Jun 2017
1,380 posts
#8

Similar story on my end — @Jackson Thomas, the profile-quality point is the whole thing really.

The thing I did not expect was that the discovery feed surfaces profiles that have not been touched in months — and nobody mentions it when they talk about screening before you meet.

On balance, how specific you're about what you want is a better predictor of how many conversations survive past day three than the feature list, though it varies enormously by city on swipe apps.

Things I wish someone had said about safety & verificat:

  • Put something concrete in the opener if screening before you meet is your main concern.
  • Say what you want in the first two lines, and doubly so for ordinary users.
  • Pick your own venue for a first meeting, because it is the single strongest signal you control.
  • Put something concrete in the opener if screening before you meet is your main concern.
CarterB
Joined Nov 2022
3,315 posts
#9

Has anyone had the reverse happen where screening before you meet is concerned?

The bit that keeps catching me out is that the messaging limit gives you no idea when an account was last opened, which is the real problem with swipe apps.

As far as I can tell, how long you leave a conversation running is a better predictor of how satisfied you're after a month than how many matches you accumulate.

The one change that worked was putting one specific interest in the bio — it made conversations last past the first exchange once screening before you meet was the priority.

The checklist I ended up with for swipe apps:

  • Write the bio for one person, not everyone — with dating app based this is the difference-maker.
  • Move to a voice or video call early — the alternative wastes weeks.
  • Stop apologising for wanting something specific, and doubly so for ordinary users.
  • Set a daily time limit — the cost of getting it wrong is high and the cost of getting it right is nothing.

Join the discussion

Have direct experience with dating app based on location impact your privacy? — safety & verificat? Members value first-hand accounts far more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.

Create your account Browse all threads