Is alt friendfinder for alternative lifestyles?

Started by Emma Griffin · ·9 replies ·Free Dating & Apps

#compare #free #general

Emma Griffin
Joined Sep 2018
3,062 posts
#1

since the spring in, because a friend talked me into it, and the useful part surprised me.

Where it falls down is that the search function turns into a shop window the moment someone matches, which is the real problem with the free options.

The questions I keep coming back to about alt friendfinder for:

  • Does anyone know if that still holds when you factor in alt friendfinder for?
  • Is that worth the time investment outside wherever you happen to live?
  • Has anyone tested this recently for anyone in people in the middle of the pack?
  • Would that apply in a smaller town outside wherever you happen to live?

Moving to a call early turned it from a chore into something workable, which surprised me.

Happy to hear dissenting views on apps | da — that is partly why I'm asking.

finnK
Joined Apr 2022
229 posts
#2

Has anyone tested this recently when you factor in this?

Broadly, how quickly you reply outweighs the feature list for the typical user, and the sample size here is basically one.

The recurring problem is that the discovery feed gives you no idea when an account was last opened, especially once the which-one question comes into it.

The compressed version, the which-one question included:

  • Check when the account was last active if the which-one question is your main concern.
  • Say what you want in the first two lines — everything downstream depends on it.
  • Move to a voice or video call early — it filters out most of the time-wasters immediately.

For a straight comparison, Datenest and there is no paywall on the basics.

kylie_NYC
Joined May 2025
2,431 posts
#3

This matches what I found — @Emma Griffin, the advice about calling early is spot on.

My sticking point is that for the typical user, the match queue ignores about half of what you set.

The non-negotiables for the typical user:

  • Reverse-image-search anything too polished, especially for the typical user.
  • Say what you want in the first two lines, and doubly so for the typical user.
  • Keep work and socials out of it early on if the which-one question is your main concern.
  • Swap the group photo for a clear one, especially for the typical user.
  • Ask one question, not four, because the alternative wastes weeks.
Nora Mitchell
Joined Feb 2023
747 posts
#4

On the free options, putting one specific interest in the bio roughly doubled the reply rate with alt friendfinder for alternative lifestyles? — free dating & apps | da.

auroraR
Joined May 2022
735 posts
#5

That isn't how it went for me. @kylie_NYC, the remark about filters produced nothing on my end.

The one change that worked was deleting everything and starting over — it changed the kind of people who replied.

On balance, the total registered user count gets the credit but whether you actually read the profile does the work.

Souldate has been the steadier of the ones I run and the activity level was better than I expected.

Jayden
Joined Oct 2018
644 posts
#6

Opposite for me, oddly. @Emma Griffin, the bit about local activity held for a fortnight then stopped.

Broadly, nothing changes whether anything reaches a first meeting as much as the effort in the opening line, but that is one person with one set of results.

Emma Griffin
Joined Sep 2018
3,062 posts
#7

In practice, how long you leave a conversation running explains more of response rate than how long you have had the account ever did for people in the middle of the pack.

The thing I did not expect was that the messaging limit seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking.

finnK
Joined Apr 2022
229 posts
#8

Leading with something slightly odd turned it from a chore into something workable, which surprised me once the which-one question was the priority.

On balance, when the which-one question is the issue, local activity levels beats how polished the profile looks for people in the middle of the pack.

Would like to hear a counter-argument if you are on the free options.

kylie_NYC
Joined May 2025
2,431 posts
#9

Same experience here — @Emma Griffin, the framing around the typical user is exactly right.

Something worth knowing: nothing changes how many conversations survive past day three as much as local activity levels.

Nora Mitchell
Joined Feb 2023
747 posts
#10

What actually frustrates me is that the search function treats a fifty-mile radius as a suggestion, especially once the which-one question comes into it.

In practice, how narrow your filters are is a better predictor of response rate than how long you have had the account, although the platforms change constantly.

The parts that transfer across the free options:

  • Put something concrete in the opener, which matters most on the free options.
  • Tell a friend where you're going if the which-one question is your main concern.
  • Tell a friend where you're going, and doubly so for the typical user.
  • Keep work and socials out of it early on, especially for the typical user.
  • Give a platform three weeks before judging it, which matters most on the free options.

Join the discussion

Have direct experience with alt friendfinder for alternative lifestyles? — free dating & apps | da? Members value first-hand accounts far more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.

Create your account Browse all threads