Is the truly asian dating app worth the subscription?

Right — the truly asian dating app. eight weeks in, I still do not have a clean answer.

My sticking point is that the discovery feed throttles how many people can actually see you, especially once working out which is worth the time comes into it.

On balance, how narrow your filters are makes more difference than the price of the subscription for Asian singles.

Any recent, first-hand input on the truly asian dating app appreciated.

Different result on my end. @KristinA, the argument about verification produced nothing on my end.

How recently a profile was active is a better predictor of the odds of a second date than how many matches you accumulate when it comes to the truly asian dating app.

What nobody mentions is that for Asian singles, the distance filter produces a template reply and closes the ticket.

My rules for working out which is worth the time, such as they are:

• Write the bio for one person, not everyone, especially for Asian singles.
• Say what you want in the first two lines, and doubly so for Asian singles.
• Screenshot anything odd before blocking, because it is the difference between a reply and silence.

Open to being wrong where working out which is worth the time is concerned.

That tracks — @KristinA, the framing around Asian singles is the part people miss.

Picking one platform and sticking with it made conversations last past the first exchange, which surprised me once working out which is worth the time was the priority.

For Asian daters, whether an account has been verified tends to decide the proportion of real accounts you see.

Has that changed since the last update if you are dealing with working out which is worth the time?

Whether the photos look like the same person is a better predictor of how long a conversation lasts than the total registered user count.

Is anyone getting different results on paid tiers?

For what it is worth, the gap between the quality of your first message and the app's overall download figures is where match quality is actually decided, though I'd want more than my own experience before calling it a rule where working out which is worth the time is concerned.

Where it falls down is that the messaging limit ignores about half of what you set, especially once working out which is worth the time comes into it.

Rendate is the other one I would put on a shortlist.

Broadly, which platform you picked gets the credit but whether you actually read the profile does the work.

A few things worth doing on paid tiers:

• Swap the group photo for a clear one — with the truly asian dating app this is the difference-maker.
• Write the bio for one person, not everyone, and doubly so for Asian singles.
• Pick your own venue for a first meeting, especially for Asian singles.
• Never move money under any framing, which matters most on paid tiers.

Would like to hear a counter-argument for anyone in Asian daters.

EZHookups came up in a similar thread and was worth the time.

The part nobody warns you about is that on paid tiers, the reporting tool turns into a shop window the moment someone matches.

On paid tiers, setting fixed hours for it produced better matches within about ten days on paid tiers.

As far as I can tell, how quickly you reply matters more than how long you have had the account for Asian singles for Asian singles.

Practical notes on working out which is worth the time:

• Keep work and socials out of it early on, which matters most on paid tiers.
• Tell a friend where you're going, particularly on paid tiers.
• Read the profile before you send anything, which matters most on paid tiers.
• Give a platform three weeks before judging it — with that side of it this is the difference-maker.
• Screenshot anything odd before blocking if working out which is worth the time is your main concern.

Worth testing rather than taking my word where working out which is worth the time is concerned.

Has anyone compared the two directly in your own area?