Is there a personals dating app that replaced Craigslist?

two months in, after deleting everything and starting fresh, and my view has shifted twice since.

What wore me down was that the search function shows the same faces on a loop, which is the real problem with free-tier services.

My working theory is that when the which-one question is the issue, the honesty of the bio matters more than whether it has a swipe interface.

Open questions, if anyone has dealt with a personals dating app that replaced craigslist? — free dating & a in practice:

• Has anyone compared the two directly across free-tier services?
• Would that apply in a smaller town given the which-one question?
• Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions for anyone in most of us?
• Does anyone know if that still holds when you factor in a personals dating app that replaced craigslist? — free dating & apps?
• Does that hold outside the big cities given the which-one question?

The one change that worked was swapping the main photo — it got three actual meetings out of six weeks for most of us.

If you have opinions on dating & apps, especially unpopular ones, go ahead.

That tracks — @LilyDates, the argument about verification is underrated.

The thing I didn't expect was that the match queue buries you the moment you stop checking daily, especially once the which-one question comes into it.

As far as I can tell, for most of us, the clarity of your main photo tends to decide the proportion of real accounts you see, but that was months ago and things move.

Short version for ordinary users:

• Swap the group photo for a clear one, especially for ordinary users.
• Say what you want in the first two lines, especially for ordinary users.
• Ask one question, not four, because the platforms won't do it for you.
• Move to a voice or video call early, because the alternative wastes weeks.

The recurring problem is that for ordinary users, the messaging limit produces a template reply and closes the ticket.

Has anyone found the opposite for most of us?

I read it the other way. @Nora Rodriguez, the note on free-tier services may have been better luck than most get.

The recurring problem is that the search function buries you the moment you stop checking daily, which is the real problem with free-tier services.

As far as I can tell, the app's overall download figures gets the credit but how well a platform handles reports does the work.

That is where I have got to where the which-one question is concerned.

Broadly agreed — @LilyDates, the note on free-tier services matches my experience.

The detail that ruins it is that for ordinary users, the photo verification step buries you the moment you stop checking daily.

Swapping the main photo roughly doubled the reply rate.

Datebound is worth twenty minutes if you're building a shortlist.

Happy to be argued with given how fast free-tier services change.

Where it falls down is that for ordinary users, the search function collapses once you move outside a major city.

Datescout is the other one I would put on a shortlist.