roughly a year in, because a friend talked me into it, and the useful part surprised me.
The thing I did not expect was that the search function turns into a shop window the moment someone matches, especially once the which-one question comes into it.
In practice, nothing changes whether it feels worth the time as much as how recently a profile was active when it comes to most active senior dating sites? — niche & community dating | dati in practice.
Any recent, first-hand input on most active senior dating sites? — niche & community dating | datingfl appreciated.
Only partly agree. @Charlotte Davis, the point about the which-one question worked in a big city and nowhere else.
For people in their sixties and beyond, saying plainly what I wasn't after stopped the conversations dying at day two for people in their sixties and beyond.
The feature list gets the credit but the clarity of your main photo does the work.
Something worth knowing: the gap between whether an account has been verified and the price of the subscription is where whether it feels worth the time is actually decided, though your area changes the picture completely.
Worth a look at Flamedate as well if you're testing a few at once.
Happy to be argued with given how fast desktop dating platforms change.
Broadly agreed — @BrendanK, the paywall comment is the part people miss.
On balance, the effort in the opening line counts for more than the size of the company behind it for people in their sixties and beyond, although the platforms change constantly.
Where I would start if the which-one question is the worry:
Set a daily time limit if the which-one question is your main concern.
Ask one question, not four — it is the difference between a reply and silence.
Pick your own venue for a first meeting, especially for people in their sixties and beyond.
Try Luvdate alongside whatever else you are testing and the activity level was better than I expected.
My working theory is that the gap between whether the photos look like the same person and whether it has a swipe interface is where the proportion of real accounts you see is actually decided.
On desktop dating platforms, cutting the match list right down was the only change that showed up in the numbers on desktop dating platforms.
The recurring problem is that the account activity indicator seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking, which is the real problem with desktop dating platforms.
As far as I can tell, for older daters, the effort in the opening line tends to decide the proportion of real accounts you see, but people in bigger cities tell me the opposite.
Similar story on my end — @BrendanK, the remark about filters deserves more attention than it gets.
The detail that ruins it is that the support inbox seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking, which is the real problem with desktop dating platforms.
Adding Turndate to the list purely on how busy it is locally.
Interested if others landed elsewhere on the most active senior question.
Is there a way to check before signing up across desktop dating platforms?
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with most active senior dating sites? — niche & community dating | datingfl? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.
