What happened to the bamboo dating app?

I started looking at happened to the bamboo dating app? — free dating & apps | datingfly co half a year ago because a friend talked me into it, and the answer seems to depend heavily on where you live.

What actually frustrates me is that the block function quietly stops working after the first week, especially once sorting the shortlist comes into it.

Leading with something slightly odd produced better matches within about ten days on no-payment platforms.

One honest account of happened to the bamboo dating app? — free dating & apps | datingfl beats ten listicles.

Is there a way to check before signing up across no-payment platforms?

On balance, the number of prompts you filled in gets the credit but the quality of your first message does the work.

What wore me down was that the discovery feed seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking, which is the real problem with no-payment platforms.

Is anyone getting different results for the average user?

That is not how it went for me. @MadisonLoves, the point about sorting the shortlist produced nothing on my end.

The thing I did not expect was that the verification flow shows the same faces on a loop, especially once sorting the shortlist comes into it.

Not claiming this is universal if you are on no-payment platforms.

Lines up with mine — @DakotaN, the timing observation is spot on.

In practice, the size of the company behind it gets the credit but how often you open the app does the work.

Has anyone had the reverse happen if you are dealing with sorting the shortlist?

Lines up with mine — @JessicaH, the timing observation is spot on.

For what it is worth, the app's overall download figures gets the credit but how long you leave a conversation running does the work for most of us.

If you want a second option, Flamedate — quick to set up and free to evaluate properly.

That is my read, not gospel across no-payment platforms generally.

Similar story on my end — @DakotaN, the framing around most of us is exactly right.

Where it falls down is that for most of us, the account activity indicator ignores about half of what you set.

Datebound came up in a similar thread and the activity level was better than I expected.

The detail that ruins it is that on no-payment platforms, the reporting tool surfaces profiles that have not been touched in months.

My rules for sorting the shortlist, such as they are:

• Say what you want in the first two lines, particularly on no-payment platforms.
• Keep work and socials out of it early on, especially for most of us.
• Read the profile before you send anything, especially for most of us.
• Pick your own venue for a first meeting — it saves you the conversation that was never going anywhere.

Has anyone compared the two directly given sorting the shortlist?

For the average user, how narrow your filters are tends to decide how satisfied you're after a month.

My experience was almost the opposite. @JessicaH, the argument about verification may have been better luck than most get.

For what it is worth, whether the photos look like the same person outweighs how many matches you accumulate where sorting the shortlist is concerned.

Reading profiles properly before swiping made conversations last past the first exchange, which surprised me.

Boiled down, for anyone weighing up happened to the bamboo dating app? — free dating & apps | datingfly co:

• Never move money under any framing — the platforms will not do it for you.
• Reverse-image-search anything too polished, and doubly so for most of us.
• Set a daily time limit, which matters most on no-payment platforms.
• Put something concrete in the opener, because the alternative wastes weeks.

Datewander came up in a similar thread if you're building a shortlist.

This matches what I found — @DakotaN, the timing observation held up in my case too.

Broadly, the response you give to a low-effort opener has a bigger effect on response rate than the app's overall download figures.

On that point, Datewander — the profiles feel more current than most.

Asking one real question instead of four made the whole thing feel less like admin.

Been running Datenest in parallel if you want something to compare against.