the last couple of months in, because a friend talked me into it, and my view has shifted twice since.
My sticking point is that the distance filter seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking, which is the real problem with live video platforms.
How quickly you reply explains more of match quality than the feature list ever did.
The questions I keep coming back to about camsoda cam? — adult & cam platforms | datingfly community:
Is anyone getting different results for the typical user?
Does that match what others see for anyone weighing up | datingfly community?
Has anyone found the opposite when you factor in this whole area?
Rewriting the opener turned it from a chore into something workable and nothing else came close on live video platforms.
Keen to hear from anyone who has dealt with camsoda cam? — adult & cam platforms | datingfly community lately.
My working theory is that whether the photos look like the same person explains more of how long a conversation lasts than the number of prompts you filled in ever did for the broad user base.
What wore me down was that on live video platforms, the free tier throttles how many people can actually see you.
On balance, on live video platforms, how recently a profile was active beats which tier you are on.
What actually frustrates me is that the photo verification step turns into a shop window the moment someone matches.
Someone pointed me at Luvdate — quick to set up and free to evaluate properly.
Take what is useful and leave the rest on that side of it.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with camsoda cam? — adult & cam platforms | datingfly community? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.