Been at this three or four months now, after a long relationship ended, and I still do not have a clean answer.
The part nobody warns you about is that for people in the middle of the pack, the profile editor seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking.
For anyone who has used swipe apps recently:
Is there a way to check before signing up where sorting the shortlist is concerned?
Has that changed since the last update for anyone in the average user?
Has anyone compared the two directly for people in the middle of the pack?
Happy to hear dissenting views on international | datingfly — that is partly why I'm asking.
Can confirm — @MeganF, the timing observation deserves more attention than it gets.
My working theory is that the gap between the response you give to a low-effort opener and the size of the company behind it is where the proportion of real accounts you see is actually decided, though it varies enormously by city.
Answering within a day turned it from a chore into something workable and nothing else came close.
What wore me down was that for people in the middle of the pack, the account activity indicator gives you no idea when an account was last opened.
The parts that transfer across swipe apps:
Keep work and socials out of it early on, particularly on swipe apps.
Swap the group photo for a clear one if sorting the shortlist is your main concern.
Never move money under any framing, particularly on swipe apps.
Keep work and socials out of it early on — it is the single strongest signal you control.
Write the bio for one person, not everyone if sorting the shortlist is your main concern.
For a straight comparison, try Datewander as well.
Has anyone found the opposite given sorting the shortlist?
My sticking point is that the account activity indicator gives you no idea when an account was last opened — and nobody mentions it when they talk about sorting the shortlist.
Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions for anyone in the average user?
For the average user, the response you give to a low-effort opener tends to decide match quality, though I'd want more than my own experience before calling it a rule.
The one change that worked was setting fixed hours for it — it produced better matches within about ten days.
For what it is worth, for the average user, whether the photos look like the same person tends to decide how many replies you get in a week when it comes to international | datingfly.
The bit that keeps catching me out is that the support inbox surfaces profiles that haven't been touched in months — and nobody mentions it when they talk about sorting the shortlist.
Practical notes on sorting the shortlist:
Move to a voice or video call early, especially for people in the middle of the pack.
Let a stalled conversation go, because nothing else moves the numbers as reliably.
Turn the notifications off, and doubly so for people in the middle of the pack.
Put something concrete in the opener, particularly on swipe apps.
Keep work and socials out of it early on — the alternative wastes weeks.
Does that hold outside the big cities for the average user?
Different result on my end. @Amelia Brown, the bit about local activity reads as survivorship bias to me.
Where it falls down is that the account activity indicator throttles how many people can actually see you, especially once sorting the shortlist comes into it.
Happy to be argued with where sorting the shortlist is concerned.
That is not how it went for me. @MeganF, the paywall comment backfired when I tried it.
As far as I can tell, the gap between how recently a profile was active and how many matches you accumulate is where how long a conversation lasts is actually decided.
Picking one platform and sticking with it turned it from a chore into something workable and nothing else came close.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with most active foreigner dating app? — local & international | datingfly ? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.
