eight weeks of trying to work out specific dating apps for 17 year olds that are moderated? — free datin, having given up on it once already, and the honest answer is it depends, but not on what people say it does.
What actually frustrates me is that the distance filter buries you the moment you stop checking daily.
What I am actually trying to work out regarding evaluating the alternatives:
Is that worth the time investment for anyone in people without a niche?
Does that hold outside the big cities once you factor in evaluating the alternatives?
Does anyone know if that still holds with genuinely free apps?
Is that still true for anyone weighing up this?
Does that hold outside the big cities across genuinely free apps?
Direct experience of the question is what I'm after.
Has anyone had the reverse happen where evaluating the alternatives is concerned?
For what it is worth, when evaluating the alternatives is the issue, how narrow your filters are has a bigger effect on the odds of a second date than the feature list.
Would like to hear a counter-argument where evaluating the alternatives is concerned.
Echoing this — @Stella Young, the profile-quality point deserves more attention than it gets.
More often than not, on genuinely free apps, the willingness to suggest meeting early matters more than the marketing on the homepage, but that is one person with one set of results.
Reading profiles properly before swiping got three actual meetings out of six weeks and nothing else came close.
More often than not, when evaluating the alternatives is the issue, the response you give to a low-effort opener beats the total registered user count.
Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions for people without a niche?
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with specific dating apps for 17 year olds that are moderated? — free datin? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.
