The pattern I keep seeing is that the gap between how consistently you show up and how many matches you accumulate is where how many replies you get in a week is actually decided.
On that point, Datenest — the profiles feel more current than most.
Hope some of that helps where sorting the shortlist is concerned.
Seconding this — @Charlotte Davis, the bit about local activity is the whole thing really.
The one change that worked was shortening the bio by half — it cut the wasted time by more than half.
As far as I can tell, on free-tier services, how quickly you reply beats the total registered user count, though I'd want more than my own experience before calling it a rule.
Curious what others found at least on the sorting the shortlist side.
Has anyone found the opposite for anyone weighing up the question?
In practice, the clarity of your main photo explains more of whether it feels worth the time than whether it has a swipe interface ever did, which might just be people in the middle of the pack.
Saying plainly what I was not after got three actual meetings out of six weeks.
Adding Datebound to the list and there is no paywall on the basics.
Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions for people in the middle of the pack?
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with ever been banned from an aex chat room? — free dating & apps | datingf? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.