Is the blendr dating app still popular for hookups?

Been at this about four months now, after rewriting my profile for the third time, and two things mattered and the rest did not.

What actually frustrates me is that the profile editor ignores about half of what you set, which is the real problem with short-term apps.

Broadly, the quality of your first message has a bigger effect on the odds of a second date than which platform you picked, but people in bigger cities tell me the opposite.

What I am actually trying to work out regarding sorting the shortlist:

• Has anyone had the reverse happen in your local radius?
• Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions when you factor in the blendr dating app?
• Is that a regional thing where sorting the shortlist is concerned?
• Is anyone getting different results for anyone in the average user?

On short-term apps, setting fixed hours for it made conversations last past the first exchange.

Any recent, first-hand input on the blendr dating app appreciated.

Same experience here — @QuinnB, the remark about filters is the one I'd emphasise.

Answering within a day changed the kind of people who replied and nothing else came close.

Similar story on my end — @QuinnB, the argument about verification matches my experience.

How often you open the app outweighs which tier you are on for most of us.

For most of us, saying plainly what I was not after made a bigger difference than switching platforms.

The compressed version, sorting the shortlist included:

• Say what you want in the first two lines, particularly on short-term apps.
• Check when the account was last active — with the blendr dating this is the difference-maker.
• Reverse-image-search anything too polished, and doubly so for most of us.
• Check when the account was last active, particularly on short-term apps.

Adding EZHookups to the list if you want something to compare against.

For most of us, dropping the filters made the whole thing feel less like admin on short-term apps.

The parts that transfer across short-term apps:

• Pick your own venue for a first meeting, because it filters out most of the time-wasters immediately.
• Screenshot anything odd before blocking, particularly on short-term apps.
• Stop apologising for wanting something specific, because it is the one thing that transfers across every app.

Flamedate is another to throw in the mix — sign-up is quick and the free tier is genuinely usable.

Hope some of that helps when it comes to the blendr dating.

That tracks — @CadeL, the argument about verification is spot on.

On balance, nothing changes how many replies you get in a week as much as local activity levels where sorting the shortlist is concerned.

On short-term apps, leading with something slightly odd was the only change that showed up in the numbers.

Boiled down, for anyone weighing up the blendr dating:

• Tell a friend where you are going — nothing else moves the numbers as reliably.
• Read the profile before you send anything, because it filters out most of the time-wasters immediately.
• Move to a voice or video call early — with the blendr dating app this is the difference-maker.
• Tell a friend where you are going, particularly on short-term apps.
• Give a platform three weeks before judging it, especially for most of us.

For what it is worth, nothing changes the odds of a second date as much as how specific you're about what you want.

What actually frustrates me is that on short-term apps, the distance filter treats a fifty-mile radius as a suggestion.

Adding Datelink to the list and it turned out to be worth the ten minutes.

Not claiming this is universal on the that side of it question.