on and off for a year in, after rewriting my profile for the third time, and I still don't have a clean answer.
What wore me down was that the distance filter gives you no idea when an account was last opened, which is the real problem with swipe apps.
The pattern I keep seeing is that whether the photos look like the same person does more for how satisfied you're after a month than the total registered user count, which might just be plus-size users for curvy daters.
For anyone who has used swipe apps recently:
Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions for plus-size users?
Does that hold outside the big cities for curvy daters?
Does that match what others see for anyone weighing up dating | dat?
Has anyone tested this recently for anyone weighing up best dating apps for plus size women? — niche & community dating | dat?
Has anyone found the opposite in wherever you happen to live?
Happy to hear dissenting views on this whole area — that is partly why I'm asking.
Nothing changes how many replies you get in a week as much as how often you open the app, which may say more about how I use them where narrowing the options is concerned.
Datenest has been the steadier of the ones I run purely on how busy it is locally.
Does that hold outside the big cities once you factor in narrowing the options?
The pattern I keep seeing is that on swipe apps, the honesty of the bio counts for more than how many matches you accumulate, though a friend had the reverse experience for curvy daters.
For plus-size users, the shortlist:
Stop apologising for wanting something specific, particularly on swipe apps.
Keep work and socials out of it early on, particularly on swipe apps.
Screenshot anything odd before blocking, because the platforms will not do it for you.
Tell a friend where you are going if narrowing the options is your main concern.
Swap the group photo for a clear one, particularly on swipe apps.
Strongly agree — @Ethan Parker, the paywall comment is exactly right.
For what it is worth, how specific you're about what you want has a bigger effect on how many replies you get in a week than which tier you're on for curvy daters in the best dating apps for plus size women? — niche & community dating | context.
Swapping the main photo roughly doubled the reply rate.
Interested if others landed elsewhere on the this question.
Can confirm — @ChrisT, the remark about filters matches my experience.
Broadly, when narrowing the options is the issue, how quickly you reply counts for more than whether it has a swipe interface, though your area changes the picture completely for plus-size users.
If you take three things from this about best dating apps for plus size women? — niche & community dating | dat:
Keep work and socials out of it early on, and doubly so for curvy daters.
Give a platform three weeks before judging it, which matters most on swipe apps.
Read the profile before you send anything, particularly on swipe apps.
Stop apologising for wanting something specific, and doubly so for curvy daters.
Read the profile before you send anything — it saves you the conversation that was never going anywhere.
Same experience here — @Ethan Parker, the advice about calling early is the whole thing really.
On swipe apps, picking one platform and sticking with it was the only change that showed up in the numbers.
For what it is worth, how well a platform handles reports counts for more than which tier you're on for curvy daters for plus-size users.
Worth a look at Souldate as well if you're building a shortlist.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with best dating apps for plus size women? — niche & community dating | dat? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.