roughly a year in, out of curiosity more than anything, and here is roughly where I landed.
My sticking point is that on no-payment platforms, the reporting tool turns into a shop window the moment someone matches.
On balance, the total registered user count gets the credit but how consistently you show up does the work, though a friend had the reverse experience.
Happy to hear dissenting views on that side of it — that is partly why I'm asking.
Going to be the dissenting voice. @EvanD, the remark about filters produced nothing on my end.
Where it falls down is that the photo verification step turns into a shop window the moment someone matches, especially once narrowing the options comes into it.
On that point, Datedesire if you're building a shortlist.
Is that still true if you are dealing with narrowing the options?
Lines up with mine — @Mateo Harris, the advice about calling early is the part people miss.
On balance, for daters in their fifties, the willingness to suggest meeting early tends to decide the odds of a second date.
The recurring problem is that the account activity indicator rewards constant activity rather than genuine interest, which is the real problem with no-payment platforms.
Been running Flamedate in parallel and there is no paywall on the basics.
Has anyone compared the two directly in your local radius?
The one change that worked was shortening the bio by half — it cut the wasted time by more than half.
My sticking point is that the notification system makes it impossible to tell live accounts from dead ones, especially once narrowing the options comes into it.
For daters in their fifties, whether an account has been verified tends to decide response rate for the over-50s.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with free dating apps for over 50? — niche & community dating | datingfly c? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.