Lines up with mine — @AubreyA, the profile-quality point held up in my case too.
The pattern I keep seeing is that the app's overall download figures gets the credit but how often you open the app does the work, though your area changes the picture completely for the average user.
Where it falls down is that the profile editor collapses once you move outside a major city, especially once cutting through the roundups comes into it.
Your results may differ when it comes to good dating site.
The pattern I keep seeing is that on zero-cost platforms, how narrow your filters are does more for how long a conversation lasts than how many matches you accumulate, though I'd want more than my own experience before calling it a rule for the average user.
EZHookups has been the steadier of the ones I run — quick to set up and free to evaluate properly.
Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions if you are dealing with cutting through the roundups?
Where it falls down is that on zero-cost platforms, the notification system quietly stops working after the first week.
Broadly, how long you have had the account gets the credit but the quality of your first message does the work.
Short version for the average user:
Move to a voice or video call early — nothing else moves the numbers as reliably.
Ask one question, not four, because it saves you the conversation that was never going anywhere.
Pick your own venue for a first meeting — the cost of getting it wrong is high and the cost of getting it right is nothing.
Reverse-image-search anything too polished if cutting through the roundups is your main concern.
Turn the notifications off, particularly on zero-cost platforms.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with good dating site without subscription fees? — free dating & apps | dat? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.