Been at this six weeks now, after deleting everything and starting fresh, and my view has shifted twice since.
The part nobody warns you about is that the messaging limit surfaces profiles that haven't been touched in months, which is the real problem with swipe apps.
As far as I can tell, how specific you're about what you want is a better predictor of response rate than which tier you're on, which might just be anyone starting out.
Happy to hear dissenting views on this — that is partly why I'm asking.
I would frame that differently. @Jake_NYC, the paywall comment produced nothing on my end.
Swapping the main photo made a bigger difference than switching platforms.
Something worth knowing: the boost you paid for gets the credit but how long you leave a conversation running does the work, though it varies enormously by city.
In practice, the gap between how often you open the app and the app's overall download figures is where whether anything reaches a first meeting is actually decided.
Dropping the filters cut the wasted time by more than half with | datingfly community.
What actually frustrates me is that the messaging limit gives you no idea when an account was last opened, which is the real problem with swipe apps.
Been running Datewander in parallel — sign-up is quick and the free tier is genuinely usable.
Open to being wrong when it comes to | datingfly community.
Has anyone had the reverse happen for anyone starting out?
My working theory is that how consistently you show up outweighs which tier you are on for the average user in the good nearby dating context.
Adding Flamedate to the list and there is no paywall on the basics.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with good nearby dating app? — local & international | datingfly community? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.